In the rapidly evolving forex and CFD trading market, selecting an efficient and flexible white label platform is crucial for new brokers. Stellux, as a leading white label platform in the trading market, offers an ideal solution for new brokers to quickly enter the market, enabling operations under their own brand without developing technical infrastructure from scratch. This article compares Stellux with platforms like MT4/MT5 and SaxoTrader, highlighting its unique advantages in functional integration, technical architecture, deployment timeline, and cost control to assist brokers in making informed choices.

Stellux

Core Advantages
Stellux eliminates reliance on fragmented third-party tools, deeply integrating key broker operations—trading core, client portal, customer management, payments, and IB modules—into a multidimensional collaborative system. It supports multi-asset trading, including forex, commodities, indices, stocks, and cryptocurrencies, with full and isolated margin modes, dynamic leverage, and advanced features to meet diverse trading preferences and risk management needs. Its built-in multilingual CRM enables real-time client activity tracking, integrates multidimensional user data, analyzes retention and activity rates, and targets core clients with data-driven insights for operational decisions. The system offers a multi-tier IB structure, flexible commission mechanisms, and real-time trade monitoring to support business expansion. Payment solutions seamlessly support fiat and major cryptocurrency deposits and withdrawals.

Technical Architecture and System Stability
Stellux uses a distributed architecture with a built-in risk engine, ensuring 99.99% uptime. Its system provides real-time risk monitoring, automatically tracking high-attention trading behaviors like scalping orders, offering data to support stable operations.

Deployment Timeline and Method
Stellux offers a 3-day testing and 7-day launch cycle, supporting SaaS or on-premises deployment, ideal for startup brokers to quickly enter the market.

Cost and Fee Structure
Stellux employs a flexible pricing model with no hefty upfront investment, offering a low entry barrier.

MT4/MT5

Core Advantages
MT4 and MT5 focus on forex and CFD trading, supporting EA automated trading with basic charting and order processing. MT5 extends to multi-asset trading but relies on plugins for advanced features. No built-in CRM requires third-party integration, potentially causing data delays. IB functions are supported via limited APIs, needing extra tools for multi-level tracking. No native payment module exists, relying on external gateways, which are complex and time-consuming to integrate.

Technical Architecture and System Stability
Based on a client-server architecture, MT5 is more modern but faces compatibility issues. The system is reliable but fragmented, with stability affected by plugins and requiring manual compliance configuration. The EA ecosystem is robust, but the user interface is outdated, and stability depends on server quality.

Deployment Timeline and Method
MT4/MT5 deployment takes 2-4 weeks, requiring coordination with multiple vendors (e.g., servers and plugins). White label solutions use hosted servers, suitable for brokers familiar with the MetaQuotes ecosystem.

Cost and Fee Structure
MT4/MT5 involve licensing, server, and plugin costs, potentially reaching tens of thousands annually. Initial costs are low, but long-term maintenance is high, with fragmented integration adding hidden expenses.

SaxoTrader

Core Advantages
SaxoTrader offers professional-grade multi-asset trading with research tools and OpenAPI customization. Its CRM includes basic customer management and risk monitoring but requires extensions for full functionality. IB functions support institutional-grade networks with robust commission settlement, though retail support is limited. The payment module integrates financing and custodial accounts, supporting multi-currency, but caters more to institutional needs.

Technical Architecture and System Stability
SaxoTrader uses enterprise-grade cloud architecture, supporting OpenAPI and multi-device compatibility with high stability and institutional-grade risk management, meeting global regulatory requirements. Technical highlights include Level II pricing and algorithmic trading suites, ideal for professional traders.

Deployment Timeline and Method
SaxoTrader deployment takes 4-8 weeks via cloud hosting and API customization, suitable for institutional brokers with longer timelines.

Cost and Fee Structure
SaxoTrader uses a custom subscription and volume-based fee model, with high pricing suited for large brokers. It offers comprehensive features but has a high entry barrier.

PrimeXM

Core Advantages
PrimeXM focuses on liquidity aggregation and bridging, supporting high-frequency trading and low-latency execution for forex and CFDs. It lacks built-in CRM, focusing on bridging tools. IB functions connect via FIX API, requiring extra systems for multi-level tracking. No payment module exists, relying on external liquidity providers’ payment solutions.

Technical Architecture and System Stability
PrimeXM uses a hybrid cloud and on-premises architecture, optimized for high-frequency trading with microsecond latency, connecting to 85+ liquidity providers. Stability is high, with compliance tied to LP integration, suitable for execution-driven brokers.

Deployment Timeline and Method
PrimeXM deployment takes 1-2 weeks, focusing on bridging and LP integration, ideal for high-frequency trading brokers with fast deployment.

Cost and Fee Structure
PrimeXM charges based on trading volume with no fixed licensing fees, offering moderate overall costs. It suits high-volume brokers with low execution costs but isn’t a full-stack solution.

TradeSmarter

Core Advantages
TradeSmarter offers a proprietary platform supporting forex, CFDs, and cryptocurrencies, integrating TradingView charts and customizable risk limits. Its CRM supports remote customer service with integrated chat and phone functions. IB features include affiliate marketing tools, automated notifications, and visualized trading statistics. The payment module supports 300+ gateways with multi-currency settlement and easy customization.

Technical Architecture and System Stability
TradeSmarter uses a cloud-based proprietary platform with lightweight deployment, mobile-first design, and good stability, supporting multi-device access and basic KYC integration. Technical highlights include WordPress plugin integration and automated account reset functions.

Deployment Timeline and Method
TradeSmarter deployment takes 2 weeks via cloud deployment and lightweight WordPress plugins, suitable for retail-oriented brokers.

Cost and Fee Structure
TradeSmarter uses a monthly fee plus asset-customization model, with additional payment integration costs, offering moderate overall costs. Expanding features may increase expenses but provides high flexibility.

AlphaPoint

Core Advantages
AlphaPoint focuses on digital assets, supporting cryptocurrency and forex hybrid trading with leverage and UI/UX customization. Its CRM includes built-in KYC/AML, targeting institutional-grade client management. IB functions support affiliate networks, leaning toward crypto ecosystems. The payment module supports fiat/crypto conversion and real-time card payments via SaaS.

Technical Architecture and System Stability
AlphaPoint uses a SaaS architecture with modular UI/UX and high-capacity trading engines, achieving SOC 2 security certification and strong compliance in the crypto space. Technical highlights include 50x leverage and cross-platform mobile app support.

Deployment Timeline and Method
AlphaPoint deployment takes 2-4 weeks via SaaS turnkey and modular configuration, suitable for crypto and hybrid asset brokers.

Cost and Fee Structure
AlphaPoint uses a SaaS subscription and liquidity fee model with moderate costs, offering cost-effective leverage features, ideal for digital asset-focused brokers.

Summary

FAQ: Key Considerations for Choosing a White Label Platform

Q1: How to evaluate a platform’s integration level?
Check if the platform covers trading, CRM, IB, and payment chains to avoid delays from third-party dependencies.

Q2: How to measure stability?
Prioritize distributed architectures with real-time risk monitoring and global compliance. Test latency and plugin compatibility.

Q3: Does deployment timeline impact new brokers?
Yes, 7-14 day deployment can secure market entry. Evaluate SaaS and on-premises options for fast branding.

Q4: What are the most hidden costs?
Maintenance and expansion fees. Opt for fixed monthly models to avoid MT4/MT5’s licensing and plugin accumulation.